Skip to main content
Incidents (7 days):19— Show on the map
Flank.bgDEFENCESECURITYGEOPOLITICS
Developing story

Bucharest, RomaniaGeopolitics

Romania offers to share costs of US troops and seeks more forces

Bucharest is seeking to retain and expand the US military presence, including capabilities with greater firepower. The size of the financial offer and Washington’s response remain unknown.

By Flank Editorial TeamEditor-in-chief: Martin NestorovPublished: ConfirmedRead in Bulgarian
Share
A Romanian soldier fires a rifle on a training range as a US soldier observes.
Archive photo: A Romanian soldier trains a US soldier in weapons qualification in support of NATO’s battlegroup in Poland, 13 February 2020.Photo: U.S. Army (Wikimedia Commons)
Advertisement
Advertise here

Romania has offered to cover part of the cost of US troops on its territory in order to retain and expand their presence. President Nicușor Dan said this in an interview with the British newspaper Financial Times, cited on 12 November 2026 by 24 Chasa and the Romanian news agency News.ro.

Bucharest wants more forces and firepower

“We want more American forces and military capabilities with greater firepower,” Dan said, as quoted by 24 Chasa. According to the Romanian presidential administration, there are 1,172 US military personnel in the country, compared with around 1,700 previously.

Romanian President Nicușor Dan presented the proposal to Elbridge Colby during Colby’s visit to the region. Colby serves as US Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. Dan said he had proposed specific figures for both personnel numbers and cost-sharing.

The request goes beyond restoring previous troop numbers. It also includes strengthening combat capabilities, but without specified formations and weapons, the military effect cannot be assessed. The reduction in personnel numbers alone is also insufficient to calculate the change in combat capabilities.

The Polish example does not establish Romania’s price

The Romanian initiative is being compared with a Polish offer to fund the US presence. According to 24 Chasa and Nova Varna, Warsaw offered $15,000 a year per US service member. In its headline, News.ro suggests that the Romanian amount could be similar. This, however, establishes neither the size of Bucharest’s offer nor an agreed price.

The exact amount, types of expenditure, duration and funding mechanism are not yet known. Neither the number of additional personnel requested nor the specific capabilities have been announced, nor is it known whether Washington has accepted the proposal. This is a Romanian initiative, not an announced agreement or a decision on a new deployment. This is a developing story and further information may be added.

Bucharest cites Black Sea security as grounds for its request

Bucharest bases its request on Black Sea security, the war in Ukraine, drone incursions and threats to shipping. Dan describes Russia as the main threat to Romanian security and Mihail Kogălniceanu Air Base near Constanța as strategically important to the US.

The Romanian defence and security website Defense Romania and Nova Varna place the proposal against the backdrop of reported plans by Donald Trump’s administration to reduce the US military presence in Europe. At the same time, Dan acknowledges that the high budget deficit limits Romania’s options, despite the gradual increase in its defence spending.

In Flank’s assessment, Bucharest is using its willingness to contribute financially as an argument for a more sustained US commitment in the Black Sea. For Bulgaria, the significance lies in the future composition and tasks of the forces in its neighbouring country, not just their numbers. A possible agreement to support the current contingent would have a different military effect from the deployment of additional combat capabilities.

Why This Matters for Bulgaria

For Bulgaria, the significance lies in the future composition and tasks of US forces in neighbouring Romania. Supporting the current contingent and adding combat capabilities would have different military effects in the Black Sea. No decision on a new deployment has yet been announced.

Sources4

1 independent report3 secondary reports

We cite the source of every material fact. Unverified information is labelled as such.

Linked to this story

Share

Related topics

Atlanta, USRussia–Ukraine War

US considers Turkish and Indian proposals for limited Black Sea ceasefire

Marco Rubio said Washington was discussing options for unhindered grain and energy shipments from Russia and Ukraine. No agreement has been announced, and the scope and monitoring arrangements remain unclear.

2 min readSource: Verified media

Bucharest, RomaniaGeopolitics

Romanian prime minister discusses closer strategic partnership with US

According to News.ro, Prime Minister Luca Niculescu discussed specific ways to deepen the strategic partnership between Romania and the US with Elbridge Colby, as well as security in the Black Sea region against the backdrop of Russia’s war in Ukraine. The report contains no specific decisions on additional forces or investment.

1 min readSource: Verified media

BucharestGeopolitics

Radev attributes Romanian media criticism to speculation or a translation error

According to Dnevnik, the prime minister gave this response when asked whether he was blaming Romania for attacks in the Black Sea. Other reports carry his clarification about Bucharest, but without the original Romanian texts, the cause of the dispute remains unclear.

2 min readSource: Verified media

Subscribe to the Flank.bg newsletter

The essentials on defence and security in Bulgaria, the region and the Black Sea, in your inbox once a week.

  • The week's news in brief
  • The weekly analysis and new OSINT pieces
  • Incidents in the Black Sea
Follow Flank on Telegram too (in Bulgarian)

Just the newsletter, no ads. Unsubscribe at any time.

Newsletter

What matters in security — once a week

Just the newsletter, no ads. Unsubscribe at any time.